[suryag1201]

Description

Issue: what happens when the volume isnt a whole number of gb, like a root disk from a 2.2 gb template? resize only takes whole numbers so hitting ok without touching the size looks like it fails

Fix: Leave 2.2 visible in the Size field. If the user does not change it, do not include that value in the submit. The current disk size is then left as it is, so a 2.2 GB disk and an IOPS-only change both succeed. If the user enters a new whole-GB size, send that value.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

Created a VM with root volume, having size same as template 3.5 GB
1- Click Resize, change only IOPS, did not change the size (3.5GB) - success
2- Click Resize, change size 3.5GB to 4 GB - success
3- Click Resize, no change at all - success

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[github-actions]

🔴 Test Coverage Grade: D — Marginal

Metric	Value
Line coverage	25.82%
Branch coverage	20.09%

Grade Scale

Grade	Line Coverage	Meaning
🟢 A	≥ 80%	Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴
🟡 B	60-79%	Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉
🟠 C	40-59%	Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬
🔴 D	20-39%	Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖
⛔ F	< 20%	Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥

Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run

[sandeeplocharla]

@suryag1201 the screenshot alone might confuse the reviewer. If possible, capture images for everything you mentioned under How Has This Been Tested? section, and add some explanation to the screenshot that you added here, when you cherry-pick this to upstream.

[suryag1201]

@suryag1201 the screenshot alone might confuse the reviewer. If possible, capture images for everything you mentioned under How Has This Been Tested? section, and add some explanation to the screenshot that you added here, when you cherry-pick this to upstream.

@sandeeplocharla this came as a upstream PR review comments and they have the context and comments are also present on community PR. And, there is no much UI change which can be captured as a screenshot here