Repository navigation
GH-55380: [C++][CI] Fix Emscripten nightly jobs after Protobuf/Abseil bump #55381
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bc95679
Remove protobuf patch
tadeja 014f1de
StrptimeParser fix for preexisting arrow-utility-test failure
tadeja 9147cc7
Fix new Abseil bump arrow-substrait-substrait-test failure
tadeja 078a9b5
Revert "StrptimeParser fix for preexisting arrow-utility-test failure"
tadeja 76034e0
Skip impossible dates in StrptimeParser for Emscripten
tadeja 642110f
Apply suggestion from @tadeja
tadeja File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
4.0.14 seems to be more than 1 year old. Should we care about older versions?
https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/releases/tag/4.0.14
Was this caught failing on our CI?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can see the failure there #55381 (comment)
= after committing 014f1de StrptimeParser fix for preexisting arrow-utility-test failure
https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/41708868200/job/126171352370#step:7:4835
Details
And no, the failing
arrow-substrait-substrait-testcouldn't be seen on CI because it started with #54927 (Abseil bump),so exactly at the same time as Protobuf CMake configure failure due to the same PR #54927 (Protobuf bumpf)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@raulcd Shall we try changing Emscripten pin from
3.1.45to4.0.14(or newer)?arrow/ci/docker/ubuntu-22.04-cpp.dockerfile
Line 133 in 1998ed3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @tadeja. I think we should certainly bump that to latest (it has not changed in 3 years). What about:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, we could merge this PR as is!
I'm already testing Emscripten 4.0.14 + if check removed separately in #55414 (and later perhaps 5.0.3 too. I'll open a new PR + issue depending on results).