[DaanHoogland]

Description

This PR...

overrides #6801

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 3.86%. Comparing base (cc30155) to head (cbcc2df).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (cc30155) and HEAD (cbcc2df). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (cc30155)	HEAD (cbcc2df)
unittests	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #13937       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     20.77%    3.86%   -16.91%     
=============================================
  Files          6053      494     -5559     
  Lines        548187    42875   -505312     
  Branches      73227     8136    -65091     
=============================================
- Hits         113870     1657   -112213     
+ Misses       420976    40986   -379990     
+ Partials      13341      232    -13109     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.86% <ø> (ø)
unittests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 18932

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

🔴 Test Coverage Grade: D — Marginal

Metric	Value
Line coverage	24.51%
Branch coverage	18.68%

Grade Scale

Grade	Line Coverage	Meaning
🟢 A	≥ 80%	Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴
🟡 B	60-79%	Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉
🟠 C	40-59%	Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬
🔴 D	20-39%	Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖
⛔ F	< 20%	Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥

Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-16793)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 57990 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr13937-t16793-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 153 look OK, 3 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
test_15_retrieve_ssvm_default_files	Error	1.15	test_diagnostics.py
test_16_retrieve_ssvm_single_file	Error	1.17	test_diagnostics.py
test_17_retrieve_cpvm_default_files	Error	1.14	test_diagnostics.py
test_18_retrieve_cpvm_single_file	Error	1.15	test_diagnostics.py
test_01_ssl_offloading_isolated_network	Failure	716.52	test_ssl_offloading.py
test_10_reboot_cpvm_forced	Error	9.53	test_ssvm.py

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 18993

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-16832)

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-16842)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 54085 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr13937-t16842-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 156 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File

[DaanHoogland]

@nvazquez @vishesh92 @RosiKyu , repeatable builds are actually a (soft) requirement by apache. I finally got to finish this after a few years :’/ please considder this early in the cycle as well (no functional code change).

[vishesh92]

why do we need to remove the pinned version here?

[DaanHoogland]

Not sure if we do, I inherited the PR. we can put it back, but do we need to? imnsho it should be from the parent pom anyway.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota. Try requesting a review at a lower effort level.