chore: add a repo-level FUNDING.yml

[shenxianpeng]

Requested by Xianpeng · project thread

Summary

Before: this repo has no FUNDING.yml of its own and relies on the org-level one in cpp-linter/.github. ecosyste.ms showed empty funding_links for cpp-linter-action in the same situation, so dependency-based funds that pay through each repo's own FUNDING.yml (such as ecosyste.ms Funds) may not know where to send money for this project.

After: .github/FUNDING.yml in this repo lists the Open Collective, the same file cpp-linter/cpp-linter-action#498 added. The Sponsor button on this repo shows Open Collective only, matching the README's Sponsors section.

How: one file, open_collective: cpp-linter. GitHub Sponsors is left out until the org's Sponsors profile is live; add github: cpp-linter then. That ecosyste.ms ignores the org-level file is inferred from the empty funding_links, not confirmed in its source.

Related Issues

Relates to cpp-linter/cpp-linter-action#498.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_0122Fnwtz6X3prPd24i9hNeT

---

Generated by Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the project’s funding information to list cpp-linter as its Open Collective recipient. This change affects how the project’s funding destination is identified; it does not change application functionality.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (b1c0fc8) to head (20aa07f).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #297   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            3         3           
  Lines          248       248           
=========================================
  Hits           248       248           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 9047d2ba-3564-408a-929d-0ef057d6671a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b1c0fc8 and 20aa07f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/FUNDING.yml

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

Walkthrough

The funding configuration now lists cpp-linter as an Open Collective recipient.

Changes

Funding configuration

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Add Open Collective recipient .github/FUNDING.yml	The configuration adds cpp-linter as an Open Collective recipient.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 20aa0

The repository-level funding entry points to the project’s documented Open Collective destination; no merge-blocking risk is evident.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check		Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check		The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: adding a repository-level .github/FUNDING.yml file.
Docstring Coverage		No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}