[dinwwwh]

Removes the Macroscope entry from the open source credits table in the root README and the 3 package READMEs. Their open source credits haven't shown up on our account yet.

Claude and Pullfrog stay in the table. Only README files referenced Macroscope.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

1 warning

⚠️ 1 benchmark is dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

✅ 29 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 2 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing claude/tender-dijkstra-5n4l3e (1f1895f) with main (9c8668f)²}

Footnotes

1. 2 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on main (94c60c7) during the generation of this report, so 9c8668f was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[pullfrog]

✅ No new issues found.

Reviewed changes

• Macroscope credit removed from 4 READMEs — the <td> cell linking to macroscope.com/open-source is deleted from the sponsorship table in the root README.md and in packages/{downgrader,router,types}/README.md, leaving the Claude and Pullfrog cells intact.

grep -i macroscope across the repo returns no remaining references, confirming the PR body's claim that only READMEs referenced it. The HTML table rows stay well-formed (whole <td> removed, <tr>/</table> untouched), and there is no code, schema, or config surface affected.

  ^{｜ View workflow run ｜ Using deepseek-v4.1-flash (free via Pullfrog for OSS) ｜ 𝕏}