[lesnik512]

Adds docs/agent-ready.md, a case study of how the modern-python repos are set up for coding agents. It is linked from the agent-ready backend section of docs/services.md as proof for that offer.

The page follows the offer's four parts:

• Context: AGENTS.md, CONTEXT.md, ADRs, the docs/agents/ docs, and the standard. It links to lite-bootstrap's files as the worked example.
• Checks: justfile recipes, ruff/ty/eof-fixer, the coverage gate, floors, links, the strict docs build, the shared ADR check, and the INVARIANT: tests in this repo.
• Signals from outside the diff and telemetry: says plainly that libraries have little of either, points to the daily scheduled runs that open an issue on failure, and to lite-bootstrap for services.
• Lessons from the standard's own history: the 25 drifted ADR-check copies, the drifted failure-report scripts, and the shared _checks.yml rejected in Shared checks.yml in this repo with a derived Python matrix #95.

As agreed, the page doesn't say how much of the work agents do and doesn't name a tool. Every claim was checked against the standard and the repos. Branch coverage and pragma reasons are described as the standard has them: optional and SHOULD.

mkdocs build --strict and just test (175 tests) pass.