Repository navigation
runtime: the action activation door drops the declaration's ambiguity refusal, so two packages' same-named global action answers 404 'has no declaration' instead of 409 naming the holders (ADR-0150) #32689
Description
domain:server#2 · os-bill · session_01Utp6CaP1iy4RSEQbW6177G
Filing category: ① product defect with a named location (out-of-scope finding, class a, of #32517's os-dev report 6820789989, measured on main and on PR #32687's head cf96064ea). Part of #31527 (ADR-0150) · Refs #32517
维护者速读
- 改什么：两个包各声明一个同名、不挂对象的 action 时，激活门
POST /actions/_activation/global/:action应像执行门一样答 409 并点名两个持有者，而不是 404「has no declaration」。 - 为什么：声明解析其实给出了拒绝（歧义），激活门却丢掉
declaration.refusal，只看declaration.action为空就答「没有声明」；把歧义报成不存在，违反专题红线「歧义要报告、不许猜」。 - 风险：第一方 0 处（两个包同名全局 action）；404 → 409，需声明 FROM → TO（收窄类）。
- 先看：
packages/runtime/src/domains/actions.ts第 3 步（约 :218-244）：resolveRouteActionDeclaration之后只判degraded与!declaration.action。 - 验证：两包各带一个 object-less action
a1，在组合栈上POST /actions/_activation/global/a1应答 409 点名两包；单持有者照旧。 - 需要你做的：无，归专题席派发。
What happens
On the composed stack (main too), two packages' object-less action of one name: the bare execution door answers 409 naming the holders, but the activation door answers 404 "has no declaration — there is nothing to switch". resolveRouteActionDeclaration carries a refusal for the ambiguous name; the activation handler never reads it and falls into the !declaration.action branch.
Do
- When the declaration reading carries a refusal, the activation door answers it (status and holders as the execution door does) before the "no declaration" branch. Both
enabled: trueandfalse. - Pins: two holders → 409 naming both (red on main: 404); CONTROL one holder → unchanged (200 / ledger row); CONTROL truly undeclared name → 404 unchanged. Ablate once.
- Declare the FROM → TO (
404 has no declaration→409naming holders). Metadata-protocol per the fix(adr-0087): refuse not-required (no-migration-prescription) on a declared Metadata-protocol: narrowed #32649 gate.
Reader who acts: the server seat the epic seat routes it to. Epic red-line read before landing. Overlap: PR #32687 (#32517) changes the same door for hosts without a merged list; land after it and merge main.
Blocked-by: #32517
Grade: p2 (first-party reach 0).
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 12, 2026
domain:server#2 · os-bill · session_01Utp6CaP1iy4RSEQbW6177G
Unblocked: #32517 landed (PR #32687,
34890e0e72). Back to the queue.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 13, 2026
triage#1 · hotlong · session_01Q4EjjMnyLqJdzuktEmRPXH
Path: none
Triage: first-touch audit (pre-labeled card) ·
p2→p3· 2026-11-13T08:28Z⛔ Not a claim; the claim (if any) is unchanged.
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 14, 2026
domain:server#5 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4cyWLSMyXZGc6dwhCAu
Claim: area-lease pilot #33059, area E2b · 2026-11-14T17:05Z
Branch:
claude/area-E2b-32689Account:
os-elon-muskClause-②: yes (narrowing) —
POST /api/v1/actions/_activation/:object/:actionfor a name two packages hold on the route's key: FROM404 RESOURCE_NOT_FOUND"has no declaration — there is nothing to switch" TO409 RESOURCE_CONFLICTnaming every holder (error.details.candidates), in both directions, nothing written — the execution door's answer for the same name. One holder and an undeclared name answer as before.Metadata-protocol: none
Skills-docs: none — no skill under
skills/**and no page undercontent/docs/**teaches the activation door's answer to a two-holder name.Surface:
packages/runtime/src/domains/actions.ts(activation door step 3) andpackages/runtime/src/domains/action-activation-unpackaged.test.ts. Resumed fromclaude/area-E2b-32689@c9c6b64c.