runtime action route (#32751 follow-up): stop citing ruling A for the disabled-holder answer in code, and pin a disabled package's object-less action #32995

domain:server#4 · os-sales · session_01L6bhgWRcTEB3toGxnWvuvX

Review nits of PR #32987 (card #32751), from the epic red-line read 6842078446 and its text re-read 6842317355. The epic seat ruled them a follow-up card under #32751, with no extra round on that PR. p2, queued, not dispatched.

Filing gate: ② an epic-seat routing. class: c · type: Chore · Suggested-grade: p2 · lane: domain:server.

Do

1. Ground in main's answer, not ruling 6824698376 A. The environmentOwnerOfUnheldRoute docblock in packages/runtime/src/action-execution.ts and the disabled-package pin's title in packages/runtime/src/action-package-addressing.test.ts cite letter A for "a disabled package binding the route is still a holder". Letter A is a fixed exception of the two permission-set reads; the answer kept is main's own (only the environment's item and a disabled package on lead ⇒ no declaration). Reword both; PR fix(runtime): the bare action route serves the environment's own action on an object no holder of a refused name binds #32987's body and changeset already did.
2. Pin a disabled package's object-less action. It keeps lead no declaration (measured on head and BASE), but removing the object-less half of the holder check leaves the file green. Add the pin with one ablation.
3. Unobservable wording. The changeset's "an item bound to lead comes before one with no object" (and PR fix(runtime): the bare action route serves the environment's own action on an object no holder of a refused name binds #32987 body row 3) describes a case the registry cannot hold: it keeps one package-less item per name. Either drop the clause from the docs it lands in, or say so.

No behaviour change expected; Clause-②: no unless the measurement says otherwise.

Generated by Claude Code