docs: add missing section separator in stats/base/dists/poisson/quantile

[Planeshifter]

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• Follow-up fixes for commits merged to develop between 2026-10-07 12:22 UTC and 2026-10-08 12:22 UTC (e2dd9ec9a..c36cc641c).

stats/base/dists/poisson/quantile

• Add missing * * * rule before <section class="c"> in stats/base/dists/poisson/quantile/README.md, omitted in e2dd9ec when the "C APIs" section was added. Matches tools/snippets/c.md and sibling packages.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

No.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

Commits reviewed: e2dd9ec (stats/base/dists/poisson/quantile C implementation), b36d46a (stats/base/dists/t/logcdf C implementation), c36cc64 (stats/base/dists/betaprime/logcdf C implementation).

Validation

• Style guide compliance (docs/style-guides, tools/snippets) for C sources, addons, manifests, lib/native.js, benchmarks, examples, tests, and READMEs, compared against packages with existing native implementations (poisson/cdf, t/cdf, betaprime/cdf, beta/logcdf).
• Bug scan of the diff, including C/JS parity for edge cases (NaN, infinities, domain checks), N-API arity macros, and manifest dependencies. No bugs found.
• Deliberately excluded: anything requiring interpretation (e.g., x[i] vs x[ i ] spacing in betaprime/logcdf/test/test.native.js, which mirrors the package's existing tests).

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

This PR was written primarily by Claude Code as part of an automated daily review of commits merged to develop.

---

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01H8ejvBXr1U6Mf1qvrxQqL9

---

Generated by Claude Code

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
stats/base/dists/poisson/quantile	$\\color{green}471/471$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}57/57$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}6/6$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$	$\\color{green}471/471$ $\\color{green}+100.00\\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.