Repository navigation
perf: speed up _unescape_special_chars for large documents #748
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
nicholasserra
merged 6 commits into
trentm:master
from
SwastikTripathi:perf/unescape-special-chars
Nov 9, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fb5899e
perf: speed up _unescape_special_chars for large documents
SwastikTripathi 4bf3ddb
Address review: nonlocal flag, define _sub once, ASCII comments
SwastikTripathi ed6330a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into md2-748-merge
SwastikTripathi 58cd6cb
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into perf/unescape-speci…
SwastikTripathi be9bb4e
Simplify the unescape loop to while replaced
SwastikTripathi a13e621
Merge branch 'master' into perf/unescape-special-chars
nicholasserra File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be perhaps faster and simpler if instead of building a
replacementsdict, you just did this in the_subfunction:Maybe more memory efficient?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That works for
html_blocks, which is keyed by hash, but_escape_tableand_code_tablego the other way ({original: hash}, e.g.self._code_table[text] = hashed), so.get(match[0])on them would always miss. To skip the dict build we would need reverse tables kept in sync at every place those two are written (the escape table is also written per URL in_protect_url). The earlymd5-check already skips the build for most calls, so I kept the dict here. Happy to add the reverse tables if you prefer that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yes, forgot about that. In that case building the map is probably the best way