Repository navigation
Conversation
Pins all four packages to 600893d on lambda-feedback-packages' rc4-preview branch (v0.3.0-rc.3 plus #11, #12 and #13), so the ports of #261, #273/#277, #276 and #278 can be tested against them. To be replaced by the v0.3.0-rc.4 tag before merging. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Oct 24, 2026
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stacked on #289. Hold: don't merge until the pin is moved to the
v0.3.0-rc.4tag.Pins all four packages to
600893don therc4-previewbranch of lambda-feedback-packages. That branch isv0.3.0-rc.3with these merged in:read_written_numberfor significant figures and decimal places (from Add support for significant figures (sig_figs) parameter #273 and Add decimal_places grading parameters #277)!=and chained equalities (from Support inequalities in the answer and response #276 and Support chained equalities in the answer and response #278)The app ports of those PRs stack on this one, so they can be tested against the package code before rc4 is tagged.
Expected failures
test_radians_to_frequency: a known failure, which also fails onmain.a!=bcases intest_exclamation_mark_for_factorialandtest_double_exclamation_mark_for_factorial.!=now parses asNe(a, b), where it used to be read asfactorial(a) = b, andcheck_equalityraisesTypeErrorwhen it subtracts anUnequality. The Support inequalities in the answer and response #276 port, stacked above this PR, fixes them; there's deliberately no stopgap here.Before merging
v0.3.0-rc.4and pin to it, instead of the SHA.README.md(which still says rc.2) andapp/docs/dev.md.🤖 Generated with Claude Code